PDF issue available for purchase
Print issue available for purchase
ISSN: 1933-2882 (print) • ISSN: 1933-2890 (online) • 1 issues per year
Published Open Access as part of the Berghahn Open Society collection.
Senior Editor: Sharon Kowalsky, East Texas A&M University, USA
Founding Editor: Francisca de Haan, Central European University
Subjects: History; Central, Eastern, and Southeastern European Studies; Gender Studies; Politics
Over the past two decades,
Based on an analysis of archival documents, personal files, correspondence, registration lists, and publications, this article explores the ideological foundations of the Armenian fairy tale “Anahit,” published in 1881 by the renowned children’s author Ghazaros Aghaian (1840–1911). The tale sought to instill in young Armenian girls their nationalist double burden, combining duty to the Armenian nation with the widespread ideal of domesticated womanhood. Since its publication, the tale has remained a popular choice for young readers of Armenian literature. It successfully survived the ideological campaigns under Stalin and was adapted into a ballet (1940) and a film (1947) to convey the regime’s propaganda line to the youth. This article is the first effort to place “Anahit” in its social and historical context, with the aim of understanding the ideological potency of the tale.
This article investigates how the Ukrainian women who participated in the Norilsk Gulag Uprising remember their involvement in this event to understand how identity, namely gender and nationality, functioned during the Uprisings of 1953–1954. The source base comprises witness testimony of participants, including oral interviews conducted decades after the event in question, full-length memoirs written in the late Soviet period, and letters and short memoirs collected in the early 2000s. Testimonies by female Ukrainian participants affirm the importance of national identity to the uprisings but reveal a new lens through which to read the event: gender. Traditional gender norms, marked by a deeply ingrained value for solidarity, emerged as a prominent aspect of the women’s strike.
In the 1920s and 1930s, globally dispersed anti-Bolshevik Ukrainian nationalists used their Ukrainian-language press to cohere and defend the boundaries of their imagined community. On the pages of women’s and youth periodicals in particular, motherhood and intermarriage were hotly debated by both editors and readers. These debates centered on concerns about the reproductive futurity of the nation and often placed a disproportionate amount of blame on young Ukrainian women for not attracting or choosing a Ukrainian man. Though young Ukrainian women defended themselves against such accusations, they did not reject the basic premises of the debates: that marriage leads to children, and that mothers exert special influence over their children’s national identification. This article brings under-examined interwar periodicals together with existing scholarship on motherhood, intermarriage, nationalism, and national indifference to show how interwar Ukrainian nationalists sought to defend the boundaries of their stateless nation and ensure its reproductive futurity by discouraging would-be mothers from intermarrying.
This article examines the role of one of the oldest and most prominent women’s organizations in the United States, the Ukrainian National Women’s League of America (UNWLA), in shaping the cultural memory of the Holodomor during the Cold War era. UNWLA developed a distinct gendered repertoire of commemorative practices that combined maternal symbolism, religious ritual, and civic activism, positioning Ukrainian women as moral authorities and custodians of collective trauma. Drawing on discourse analysis, theories of communal ritual, and postmemory, the article shows how UNWLA transformed mourning and remembrance into sustained cultural and political engagement. By situating UNWLA’s work within the broader Ukrainian American diaspora, this study highlights the contribution of women’s activism to Cold War memory politics and complicates the existing historiography on Holodomor commemoration.
This article is an introduction and translation of the proceedings from an extraordinary session of Splošno slovensko žensko društvo (General Slovenian women’s society, SSŽD), held on 27 October 1923, convened to address urgent international organizational matters. The primary issue concerned participation in the upcoming Little Entente of Women (LEW) assembly in Bucharest and the selection of a Slovenian delegate. The minutes record the selection of Vera Albrechtova to represent the SSŽD in Bucharest and to manage diplomatic tensions. The document also highlights the relationship between the women’s organization and the Yugoslav foreign ministry that demanded the exclusion of Bulgarian women in exchange for financial support.
This selected correspondence exposes both the strategies and limits of managing internal tensions within interwar transnational feminism. Focusing on Bulgaria’s contested membership in the Little Entente of Women (LEW) and the movement’s entanglement with state diplomacy, the letters reveal constraints of feminist attempts to bridge the post–World War I divide between victorious and defeated states. They highlight Františka Plamínková’s mediating role during her LEW presidency, alongside persistent Yugoslav–Bulgarian conflicts over minority issues. While LEW branches could reconcile internal feminist differences, antirevisionist and nationalist positions—reinforced by foreign policies—undermined prospects for a feminist alternative to official diplomacy. Archival correspondence from two Czechoslovak women’s organizations, read against Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) documents, shows that both Romanian and Czechoslovak diplomats intervened to block Bulgaria’s admission. Initial MFA support gradually shifted into direct interference in shaping LEW’s agenda, ultimately aligning the organization with the Little Entente’s military‑diplomatic pact in the 1930s.
This article offers the first English translation of Alexandra Kollontai’s 1913 memorial essay on August Bebel, “The Great Champion of Women’s Rights and Freedom,” together with an introduction that situates the text within the socialist women’s movement and Marxist theories of women’s emancipation. It argues that far from being a simple obituary, Kollontai’s essay is at once a political tribute, compressed intellectual history, and programmatic meditation on gender, class, and social transformation. Reading the essay alongside Bebel’s
Raisa Borovsky,
Selin Çağatay, Mátyás Erdélyi, Alexandra Ghiț, Olga Gnydiuk, Veronika Helfert, Ivelina Masheva, Zhanna Popova, Jelena Tešija, Eszter Varsa and Susan Zimmermann,
Heidi Hein-Kircher, Elisa-Maria Hiemer and Denisa Nešťáková eds.,
Yulia Gradskova,
Julia Ioffe, Motherland:
Mariusz Kalczewiak,
Lisa A. Kirschenbaum,
Tijana Matijević and Milica Resanović eds.,
Mikuláš Pešta,
Gareth Pritchard and Vesna Drapac,
Anna Shadrina,
David Selim Sayers,
Zorana Simić,
Bailey Stone,