{"id":7091,"date":"2015-10-15T19:52:16","date_gmt":"2015-10-15T19:52:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/?p=7091"},"modified":"2025-05-20T14:54:19","modified_gmt":"2025-05-20T14:54:19","slug":"nancy-drew-scholar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/nancy-drew-scholar","title":{"rendered":"Solving the Mystery of Nancy Drew"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The following is a guest blog post written by Michael G. Cornelius, author of the article Sexuality, Interruption, and Nancy Drew<\/em><\/a>, which appeared in Volume 8, Number 2<\/a> of the journal Girlhood Studies<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

It’s admittedly an odd thing, to be a Nancy Drew<\/a> scholar.
\n 
\nStrictly speaking, \u201cNancy Drew Scholar\u201d is not the official occupation listed on my tax forms. And when strangers ask me what I do for a living\u2014whenever such casual conversations between strangers bubble up, such as on an airplane\u2014I never reply \u201cNancy Drew scholar.\u201d I usually say \u201cEnglish teacher\u201d or \u201cprofessor\u201d or even \u201cmedievalist\u201d (which raises more than a few eyebrows on its own, trust me.) And, at the risk of sounding like an actor who worries about typecasting, I\u2019m more than a Nancy Drew scholar. I write on a wide variety of subject matter: sword-and-sandal movies; science fiction; sexuality in the premodern and early modern eras\u2014a quick perusal of my CV would reveal books and articles with words like \u201cChaucer\u201d and \u201cShakespeare\u201d and \u201cGawain\u201d in the titles (there\u2019s also one that includes the word \u201cFarts,\u201d but that\u2019s a subject of a whole different blog post.)
\n<\/p>\n

Despite all that, around half my scholarly output involves Nancy Drew, Vicki Barr, Trixie Belden, Shirley Flight, Rick Brant, Christopher Cool, or some other girls\u2019 or boys\u2019 series protagonist. I can\u2019t help it. My obsession started at a young age when a prescient elementary-school librarian pressed a copy of Secret of the Forgotten City<\/em> (Nancy Drew #52) into my hands at the impressionable age of 9. This book had everything: mystery, adventure, secret codes, archaeology, thrilling discoveries, friendship\u2014safe and sane as these books may be, for a farm-town kid ensconced in an upstate village of 200 people and 8000 dairy cattle, this was heady stuff indeed. I never looked back, and I never outgrew my love of Nancy Drew.
\nIf you ever need evidence of this, feel free to come to my house. I can show you my collection. I have 900 Nancy Drew books (and growing). Collectible dot shelves here and there; a few pieces of original Nancy Drew artwork adorn the walls. And my CV reflects this: I\u2019ve written about Nancy Drew and primitivism; Nancy Drew and the Awkward Age; Nancy Drew and Shakespeare; Nancy Drew and sacrality; Nancy Drew and teleological perfection; Nancy Drew and illness; Nancy Drew and motherhood; and, for the piece included in the most recent edition of the the journal of Girlhood Studies<\/em> (8.2, 2015), \u201cSexuality, Interruption, and Nancy Drew<\/em><\/a>.\u201d
\nPeople sometimes look at me funny when they find out about my obsession with Nancy Drew. I don\u2019t blame them. There are precious few of us out there (though I have always contended there are not nearly enough<\/em> of us out there.) Many social critics have observed that it is our leisure time, and not our working hours, that truly defines us, whether we obsess over baseball statistics or knitting patterns or growing a pumpkin the size of a Winnebago. I obsess over Nancy Drew and her fellow girl and boy sleuths. I belong to two different girl sleuth societies; I attend Nancy Drew conventions (yes, we have them, and they are spectacular); I re-read the books; I ponder them. And I use them to understand the world. That\u2019s what it\u2019s all about, isn\u2019t it? What we academics are really doing, each in our discipline, each in our own way? Trying to understand the world\u2014our world, each world, every world. And what better way to do that than through Nancy Drew? Everyone knows her name. She is a cultural zeitgeist\u2014probably the most well-known female literary character of all time. New Nancy Drew books have been produced for the last 85 years, with no signs of stopping. And over the course of hundreds and hundreds of mysteries solved, criminal conspiracies uncovered, and villains locked behind bars, Nancy Drew\u2014directly and indirectly\u2014has confronted nearly every aspect of society, all while remaining a blank slate and a figure of mythopoesis. She is larger-than-life and yet, at the same time, utterly scribe-able to every reader, so that we may place ourselves, not in her shoes (for, indeed, no one is Nancy Drew), but next to her, in her flashlight\u2019s glow, part of her coterie, part of her circle of friends, part of her adventures and part of her world. That is the real power of Nancy Drew. The worlds of characters like Sherlock Holmes and King Arthur are too rarified for us\u2014one has to be extraordinary just to be let in the front door (even Watson, for all his bluster, is a pretty good writer). With Nancy Drew, however, one just has to be curious, and a little bit brave. We can all do that.
\n\u201cSexuality, Interruption, and Nancy Drew\u201d<\/a><\/em> looks, quite literally, at the verbal tactic of interruption in the Nancy Drew books, pondering why it is, whenever the topic of conversation turns to marriage, Nancy abruptly and vigorously changes the narrative, altering the course of conversation away from any hint of romance, marriage, coupling, and dyadism, and back to more important matters\u2014like mysteries. Take, for example, the conclusion to The Mystery at Lilac Inn<\/em>, where Nancy finds it necessary to interrupt two chums whose conversation dares to veer toward their upcoming nuptials:<\/p>\n

Later, as Nancy, Helen, and Emily were talking, the two older girls suddenly stopped speaking on the subject of their forthcoming weddings. Helen said, \u201cGoodness, Nancy, you must be tired of hearing us talk about steady partners when\u2014\u201d Nancy interrupted. Laughing gaily, she said, \u201cNot at all. For the present, my <\/em>steady partner is going to be mystery!\u201d (Keene 1961: 180)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

As a scholar, I sometimes feel as Nancy does. I love spying riddles in texts and television shows and trying to ascertain what it all might mean. Of course being a Nancy Drew scholar makes perfect sense in this imperfect world. Who is better at solving mysteries than Nancy? A Nancy Drew scholar? I\u2019m proud to be identified as such.<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

Work Cited<\/strong><\/p>\n

Keene, Carolyn. 1961. The Mystery at Lilac Inn<\/em>. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.<\/p>\n

MICHAEL G. CORNELIUS<\/strong> is the author\/editor of fifteen books, including nancy drew and her sister sleuths: essays on the fiction of girl detectives <\/em>(co-edited with Melanie E. Gregg; McFarland, 2008) and the companion book, The Boy Detectives: Essays on the Hardy Boys and Others<\/em> (McFarland, 2010). He has published extensively on Nancy Drew, Vicki Barr, and other girls’ and boys’ series literature. Cornelius is the chair of the Department of English and Communications at Wilson College in Chambersburg, PA.<\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The following is a guest blog post written by Michael G. Cornelius, author of the article Sexuality, Interruption, and Nancy Drew, which appeared in Volume 8, Number 2 of the journal Girlhood Studies.   It’s admittedly an odd thing, to be a Nancy Drew scholar.   Strictly speaking, \u201cNancy Drew Scholar\u201d is not the official… Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,168,222],"tags":[1665,129,157,255,545,375,539],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7091"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7091"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7091\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10928,"href":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7091\/revisions\/10928"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7091"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7091"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.berghahnbooks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7091"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}